The Mirena IUD has been a popular and effective form of birth control since its introduction. The plastic intrauterine device releases hormones in small amounts for as long as five years, and only abstinence surpasses Mirena in preventing conception. Many women also enjoy improved complexions and lighter or vanishing cycles after insertion of the device. In addition, those who use Mirena IUDs have no concerns about forgetting to take birth control pills and do not have to switch out contraception devices for years. However, some women have experienced problems caused by the Mirena IUD. Most of the difficulties arise from IUDs that drift out of place after insertion. Although manufacturers have always warned that perforation or migration can take place during insertion of the device, problems can occur much later as well. In some cases, the IUDs suddenly move after staying in place for several years. Government agencies have already accused Mirena IUD makers of over marketing and under warning. Many women believe they did not receive appropriate warnings about the actual risks involved in using Mirena IUDs and think the devices may be faulty as well. The number of lawsuits filed by drug lawsuit lawyers is increasing as women turn to them for assistance. Many patients who suffered complications caused by the devices have consulted with a pharmaceutical lawsuit attorney or class action lawsuit lawyers to get help in obtaining reimbursement for medical costs and compensation for pain and suffering. If an IUD migrates after the insertion period, it can cause pain, vulnerability to unplanned pregnancy, permanent bodily damage or infertility. Many women have experienced migration of Mirena IUDs that embedded themselves in surrounding organs or tissues and required surgical removal. The operations are expensive and painful, and some people cannot afford to pay the cost of surgery to remove the IUDs. Those women simply allow the devices to remain in their bodies, suffering for years with the consequences caused by the IUDs. A woman whose Mirena IUD became imbedded in the wall of her uterus about 18 months after insertion reported that her doctor said some women's bodies simply do not accept the devices. One lady experienced extreme pain that made walking difficult less than a week after insertion of a Mirena IUD by her doctor. The device migrated from its intended position, and a regular exam failed to reveal its location, but her doctor was able to find it by using ultrasound. Other women reported that their doctors were unable to locate IUDs that moved out of place and lodged in other areas of their bodies. Some women stated that although their doctors found them, the devices fastened themselves so far inside organs or tissues that removal was not possible. If an IUD drifts and embeds itself, it can push the uterus and make it necessary for a doctor to perform a hysterectomy. Even more dangerous are the cases where women do not feel any pain although they have IUDs that are traveling or perforating. Because pain does not alert them to potential problems, the women do not seek help, and their bodies can incur great harm while the victims remain unaware of their situations. Any woman who has suffered complications from a Mirena IUD may be eligible to receive compensation for damages including pain and suffering as well as for medical expenses. She can seek assistance in filing a lawsuit by contacting an experienced drug lawsuit lawyer. A competent pharmaceutical lawsuit attorney will be familiar with the proper procedures to use in filing claims against the manufacturer to ensure a successful outcome for the case. The injured person may also want to inquire about the advisability of taking legal action through a class action suit by consulting a class action lawsuit lawyer.